April 2007
Raible Designs | JSF still sucks?
by ddelangleConclusion: don't use JSF simply because it's a "standard". Use other frameworks that are more actively developed and designed for the web. For component-based frameworks, the most popular are Tapestry and Wicket. Less popular ones are RIFE and Click.
March 2006
Enterprise Java Community: Building Custom JSF UI Components
by ddelangle (via)How to create a JSF component
January 2006
Oracle ADF Faces Goes Open Source
by ddelangleOracle is pleased to announce the donation of ADF Faces, a rich set of UI components based on the JavaServer Faces specification, to the Apache Software Foundation
September 2005
Alexander Jerusalem: Does JSF + AJAX really make sense?
by ddelangleI can see how JSF/ASP.NET + AJAX makes sense for small lookup type operations like auto completion and, of course, for encapsulating purely client side operations such as column reordering and simple validations. But if AJAX really catches on, what it ultimately means is that the whole request processing life cycle, on which these frameworks are based, is obsolete.
August 2005
TheServerSide.com - JavaServer Faces vs Tapestry - A Head-to-Head Comparison
by ddelangle & 1 otherThe article arose from having to make a recommendation on which of the two frameworks to use in a real project. It's a task I can imagine many Java developers facing in the months to come.
1
(5 marks)